🔗 Share this article

Prosecutors have labeled it as among the biggest scams of its kind in the UK.

Altogether 14 people have been found guilty for their involvement in a £28m scheme to defraud more than 3,500 timeshare investors.

The targets were keen to get out of decades-old holiday ownership agreements and tried to find help.

Most were in the age range of 60 and 80. In excess of 500 of them surrendered more than £10,000, and one transferred over £80,000.

Those targeted were subjected to aggressive consultations continuing for six hours. They were left out of pocket, owning worthless fake "points" and still bound by expensive timeshare contracts they frequently were unable to use.

The Business Behind the Fraud

The company at the heart of the scheme was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They collected people's money to support the owners' opulent lifestyle of exclusive education, high-end properties and exclusive air travel.

The man at the top of the company, the main defendant, was given a seven and a half year jail time in January for deceptive scheme.

In the latest development, his spouse another individual was one of the final three to hear their sentences.

She was handed a two-year suspended prison term at the judicial venue after pleading guilty to financial crime.

This has been a long time coming and represents a significant success for the people who spoke out, the law enforcement and prosecutors.

The Way the Investigation Started

The first knowledge of SMT was in the that particular year. The position was in the research department of a broadcasting service, creating documentary programmes.

A colleague pointed out that his mum had taken over the rights of a holiday property in a European resort and, after long-term use, had commenced searching to get out of the deal.

It's worth mentioning how widespread timeshares had grown with UK travelers in the eighties and nineties.

Holiday ownership enabled individuals to use the identical property every year, or exchange their vacation periods with other owners who had units in alternative destinations. Approximately 600,000 vacation seekers took up that option.

The first timeshare rush was paired with a numerous stories about dishonest operators mis-selling investments. They became a staple on investigative broadcasts.

The standard holiday ownership agreement bound owners for decades.

By 2016, those investors who had experienced their assigned property in the resort for 20 or 30 years were getting older, and many were looking to end their association to their holiday properties.

Some had reduced ability to travel and were unable to visit their properties. Some just thought they'd got all they wanted from them. And a portion had deceased, in numerous instances leaving their family members to assume the deals - including their yearly fees and service charges.

The Undercover Operation Unfolds

This was the situation the family member had found herself. She looked online for answers and discovered the company, a business whose online presence assured to get her out of her contract.

However, having submitted funds and arranged an appointment with them, her loved ones smelled a rat.

Subsequent checking revealed hundreds of people reporting they had submitted funds and received no benefit out of it. Actually, they had suffered financially. Significant sums.

The reporting group began investigating what was occurring. It soon emerged that there were some shady characters active in the holiday ownership market.

A legal professional had hundreds of individual complaints preparing to take action against the organization.

We spoke to individuals who had engaged the company and they all told the same story. They thought the firm would purchase their timeshare off them but when they attended a meeting (for which they made an advance payment) they were advised there was no market for their property.

Instead, they were encouraged - in fact compelled - to commit further cash investing in "Monster Rewards", named after the business's umbrella group, Monster Travel.

The precise definition was not exactly clear. They seemed similar to a form of credit, giving access to discount travel and amenities and retail offers.

And they were reportedly "exchangeable with additional holders, at a future date.

Committing funds immediately would produce an future return that would cover SMT's fees and allow the property owner with a gain, freed at last from their troublesome deal.

An unrealistic promise? Certainly, that proved correct.

A 'Bait-and-Switch Tactic'

Based on these descriptions were correct, this was a massive scam.

The technique is termed a "misleading sales."

Someone - specifically SMT - "lures the consumer by marketing a defined offering but then to say that's not available, directing the individual towards an alternative, lesser offering.

Such practices are unlawful. Armed with all the accounts we had collected, we argued to secretly film one of the firm's consultations.

The process requires commitment, energy, and strong justifications for why this is the exclusive approach to obtain the evidence required to demonstrate illegal activity.

Armed with that permission, our small team organized a consultation with one of the firm's agents in the English town.

Acting as a member of the public aiming to get his mum released from her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement